Obama’s Global Health Plan’s Missing the Money
Yesterday President Obama announced a new "Global Health Initiative." Gayle Smith from the National Security Council and Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, the chief of staff's brother, summoned a number of my colleagues to the Old Executive Office building early yesterday to announce this new initiative with great excitement.
Should we all be excited?
The good news: Many of us have been waiting to see just what President Obama and his team would do with global health--the area of our foreign aid that has arguably seen the biggest and clearest results. It is good to see the Administration taking global AIDS seriously since it continues to be the leading cause of death in Africa--killing millions of mothers, brothers, and children. The administration also this week announced the appointment of Dr. Eric Goosby to be Global AIDS Coordinator and Ambassador, a very good sign that Secretary of State Clinton is emphasizing this post and looking for leaders close to her. Meanwhile this Administration is finally paying attention to programs like family planning, which the right wing so vociferously undermined in the last eight years. This is great news for women, youth, and people around the world.
The bad news: Looking at this announcement, though, I'm very worried that the administration is falling into a very scary trap of pitting funding for HIV/AIDS against other funding. The reason why AIDS, TB, and malaria programs have been prioritized is that they're the major infectious killers in Africa--if we can get ahead of them, we can save lives now and prevent new infections for the future. What we've seen is that these programs are also really good building blocks for other health services--like the family planning programs Republicans were so against in the last administration.
What would make a lot of sense--and what's implied by the President's announcement--would be to increase support to other areas like reproductive health and child and maternal health. These essential areas could build off the success of AIDS programs and bolster the lives of people living in poverty.
Doing so, though, will require increased investments... and that leads us to the worse news:
The worse news: This big new announcement does not actually include an increase in funding for global health and, in fact, it suggests a decrease in planned AIDS funding. As this chart from RESULTS shows, the administration is trying to get away with adding new priorities without new money by promising a six-year project instead of five and moving money around. If the very AIDS, TB, and malaria programs that Obama, Clinton, and Biden co-sponsored are fully funded (for six instead of five years) and all other programs got no boost then we would expect a total of $64 billion--$1 billion more than Obama's "new" initiative.
This is not worthy of Obama--who has promised to get rid of Bush's slights of hand in the budget process that hide the true costs of programs.
Meanwhile, while the announcement of a $63 billion initiative sounds big--this year sees essentially flat funding on almost all global health accounts (save malaria). Not an auspicious start.
A number of activists and advocacy groups have already come out with worried statements--and tomorrow when the budget comes out there is likely to be very bad news. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria--whose board is meeting now in Geneva--is going to face the first crisis. We've all been hoping the Obama administration would reverse Bush's position of undermining and underfunding the Global Fund (because it wasn't US controlled and supports scary programs like needle exchange and sex-worker programs). The Fund faces a $4-$5 billion gap between life-saving programs planned for approval in the next year or so and what donors have pledged and will face a major crisis without renewed support from the US.
Global health programs are massively smart investments: healthy people build healthy economies and strong communities. It's some of the best spending to lift people out of poverty and stabilize societies in crisis (Afghanistan and Pakistan have two of the worst TB epidemics around which sucks lives and jobs!).
But Obama does not deserve credit for taking from one planned program--that we know has been successful and saved millions of lives already--and put it into another. Doing so only changes who will die from what cause. People around the world deserve better.
Posted 10 months, 1 week, 6 days, 11 hours, 31 minutes ago
Online Discussion | |
|
By chrisal probiotics |
Currently, many people are suffering from some form of allergic disorder with a prevalence that continues to rise. Dust mites are present year-round in nearly every bedroom and home. Learned about existence of probiotics dust mites is to urgently make a cleaning and preferably wet cleaning. |
|
By Peter Healey |
yes Global health plan was actually required to get affected in the real sense. People are using Vibration Plates and other fitness equipments for keeping themselves healthy, but what about other people who’re still not so much aware about the harmness to their health. Mr.obama’s initiative is expected to be successful to the human being across the world. |
|
By Hollywood Public Relations |
What we’ve seen is that these programs are also really good building blocks for other health services—like the family planning programs Republicans were so against in the last administration Hollywood Public Relations |
|
By jercy |
Science has yet to conslusively state that CO2 is the culprit. Any modelling currently done is woefully inadequate at handling any number of factors that go into climate change. Cloudiness, cosmic ray flux due to changes in the sun, UV/vis/IR irradiance changes in the sun, urban heat island effect, etc. Thus, we have people openly saying we need to enact drastic policy changes to prevent a problem that is not well modeled and just may be entirely out of our hands as a species. Then to actually have an opinion as to whether or not one plan or another is better at preventing the poorly understood problem is, well, ludicrous, to be generous.Bridges To Recovery |
|
By david |
If doctors and drug companies pledge big donations to the Democratic Party - they will give them more of our tax dollars. |
|
By drug addiction treatment center |
The reason why AIDS, TB, and malaria programs have been prioritized is that they’re the major infectious killers in Africa—if we can get ahead of them, we can save lives now and prevent new infections for the future.drug addiction treatment center |
|
By Srini Saripalli |
Until now, I still don’t understand how Obama’s health plan works and why there are a lot of protest against it. |
|
By Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacı |
|
|
By Revizyon ile Organize Matbaacı |
Revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberi |
|
By Jim |
Currently, many people are suffering from some form of allergic disorder with a prevalence that continues to rise. Dust mites are present year-round in nearly every bedroom and home. Learned about existence of <a >probiotics dust mites</a> is to urgently make a cleaning and preferably wet cleaning. |
